user profile image

@mike


Latest reviews

mike

2 years ago

Great journal to submit to. minimal pre-submission requirements. fast turn around time from submission to decision

mike

2 years ago

Very fast peer review. And also quite reasonable. I want to give them 5 stars, but there was so many annoying pre-submission requirements and edits I’m giving it 4 stars

mike

2 years ago

I can confidently say I will never resubmit here. They had a ton of make work requirements prior to submission and were entirely inflexible on these requests. After 4 updates to for their requirements the requests kept coming so we dropped it and moved onto another journal

mike

2 years ago

Very very painful pre submission asks. And very very slow to get peer reviewed. Currently on month 4 waiting for it.

mike

2 years ago

Have submitted many articles here. They do not create work for you prior to submission, peer-review feedback is relatively fast, and their program for making edits to the proof is pretty good.

mike

2 years ago

Relatively painless submission process, though they do require some make-work tasks at time of submission (e.g., What is already known on this topic? What does this study add?) I do take issue with the fact they now charge ~$8,000 USD to publish research studies there.

mike

2 years ago

I've submitted there once and will definitely submit there again in the future. minimal pre-submission requirements and the peer-review was relatively fast.

mike

2 years ago

I have submitted many times to JGIM. Always relatively painless and this is one of my go-to journals to submit to

mike

2 years ago

Great journal to do business with. Relatively painless submission process and provided peer-review feedback quickly.

mike

2 years ago

I've submitted here twice and will definitely not submit there again. They had a very painful submission process and requested all sorts of additional time-wasting meta-information to be added (e.g., "what is known about this topic", "why does this study matter to clinicians").