@mike
Latest reviews
2 years ago
Great journal to submit to. minimal pre-submission requirements. fast turn around time from submission to decision
2 years ago
Very fast peer review. And also quite reasonable. I want to give them 5 stars, but there was so many annoying pre-submission requirements and edits I’m giving it 4 stars
2 years ago
I can confidently say I will never resubmit here. They had a ton of make work requirements prior to submission and were entirely inflexible on these requests. After 4 updates to for their requirements the requests kept coming so we dropped it and moved onto another journal
2 years ago
Have submitted many articles here. They do not create work for you prior to submission, peer-review feedback is relatively fast, and their program for making edits to the proof is pretty good.
2 years ago
Relatively painless submission process, though they do require some make-work tasks at time of submission (e.g., What is already known on this topic? What does this study add?) I do take issue with the fact they now charge ~$8,000 USD to publish research studies there.
2 years ago
I've submitted there once and will definitely submit there again in the future. minimal pre-submission requirements and the peer-review was relatively fast.
2 years ago
I have submitted many times to JGIM. Always relatively painless and this is one of my go-to journals to submit to
2 years ago
Great journal to do business with. Relatively painless submission process and provided peer-review feedback quickly.
2 years ago
I've submitted here twice and will definitely not submit there again. They had a very painful submission process and requested all sorts of additional time-wasting meta-information to be added (e.g., "what is known about this topic", "why does this study matter to clinicians").